Primary repair vs ileostomy in patients with typhoid perforation

Authors

  • Haroon Rafiul Islam
  • Ahmad Sohail
  • Azhar Attique
  • Azhar Shafique
  • Muhammad Arshad Cheema.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v11i4.1127

Keywords:

Prospective Study. Typhoid. Ileostomy. Retrospective Studies. Intestinal Perforation. Punctures. Follow-Up Studies. Ileal Diseases. Ileum.

Abstract

This is prospective study conducted in the department of Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore over the period of four years. Comparative data was compiled on 100 patients divided in two equal groups. Efficacy of two operations was assessed in terms of morbidity and mortality. The final results were conclusive enough to show the benefits of ileostomy over the primary repair in cases of typhoid perforation.

Published

2016-05-03

How to Cite

Islam, H. R., Sohail, A., Attique, A., Shafique, A., & Cheema., M. A. (2016). Primary repair vs ileostomy in patients with typhoid perforation. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v11i4.1127

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)