A Comparative Analysis of Moral Principles: Veracity versus Confidentiality versus Justice

A Comparative Analysis of Moral Principles: Veracity versus Confidentiality versus Justice

Authors

  • Khudija Mushtaq
  • Adnan Yaqoob
  • Tahmina Bano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v27i4.4899

Keywords:

Health care provider, Confidentiality, Veracity, Dilemma, Ethics, unethical, Decision making.

Abstract

A number of frameworks can be used to analyze ethical and moral issues objectively whether the act of an individual is ethically good and bad. Health care providers are ethically concerned with clients' confidentiality and veracity in their clinical practice. The current article reveals the ethical dilemma of an infertile couple. Ethical issues affect the human being physical, mentally, and socially. If the Health care provider sustains the confidentiality, contrarily it will be against the principles of veracity therefore, the truthfulness will be the topmost importance.

Downloads

Published

01/28/2022 — Updated on 02/02/2022

Versions

How to Cite

Mushtaq, K. ., Yaqoob, A. ., & Bano, T. . (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Moral Principles: Veracity versus Confidentiality versus Justice. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 27(4), 604–606. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v27i4.4899 (Original work published January 28, 2022)

Issue

Section

Short Communications

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...