Ghost in the Machine: Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v31iSpl2.6163Keywords:
Ghost, Machine, Artificial Intelligence, Medical EducationAbstract
“I think, therefore I am” -Rene Descartes(1637)
I debated whether I should get ChatGPT or MetaAI (the two versions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) I am somewhat familiar with) to write an initial draft of this editorial. It seems simple enough: a few basic prompts and you get a nice, structured write up which although a little ‘bland’, can serve the purpose. After the initial work has been done by AI, one can always edit or modify to one’s liking. Ultimately, I decided to write it the old-fashioned way, by sitting at my computer and typing. My hesitation about using AI was also because of a recent discussion at a friend’s house. My friend, a science fiction writer and novelist of some renown, spoke vocally against the use of all AI and his arguments were two-fold: by using AI, we are, of course, doing huge corporations a favor by training their LLMs (large language models) for free. These are a certain type of artificial intelligence, specifically machine learning models trained on massive amounts of text data to understand, generate and manipulate human language. Every time you send a query to Chat GPT, Gemini, Llama or others, the model ‘learns’ more about the world of humans and can then build on it. My friend’s other objection though, was more concerning: if a machine is writing an essay or an article or even a book, where is my own unique ‘voice’? The answer, of course, is ‘nowhere’! And if I am not forced to reach deep into my brain and tap into my own creativity, will that not ultimately lead to the ‘dumbing down’ of the human brain. The machines get smarter while we go the other way? It is a scary thought.
References
1. Baseer S, Jamil B, Khan S, Khan M, Syed A, Ali L. Readiness towards artificial intelligence among medical and dental undergraduate students in Peshawar, Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Edu. 2025;25:632. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06911-7BMC
2. Warraich KF. Unveiling the attitudes of medical faculty towards the integration of artificial intelligence in medical education. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2025;35(3):359–62. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2025.03.359
3. Sami A, Tanveer F, Sajwani K, Kiran N, Javed MA, Ozsahin DU, et al. Medical students’ attitudes towards AI in education: perception, effectiveness, and its credibility. BMC Med Education. 2025;25:82. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06704-y
4. Habib MM, Hoodbhoy Z, Siddiqui MAR. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of healthcare students and professionals on the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare in Pakistan. PLOS Digit Health. 2024;3(5):e0000443. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000443
5. Ma Y, Song Y, Balch JA, Ren Y, Vellanki D, Hu Z, et al. Promoting AI Competencies for Medical Students: A Scoping Review on Frameworks, Programs, and Tools. arXiv. 2024.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.18939.
6. Hill K. College professors are using ChatGPT. Some students aren’t happy. New York Times. 2025 May 14 [cited 2025 June 21]; Technology section. Available from:https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/14/technology/chatgpt-college-professors.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Annals of King Edward Medical University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments publications@kemu.edu.pk