Parent-Adolescent Relationship and Internet Addiction in Young People
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v31i4.6330Keywords:
Parent-Adolescent Relationship, Internet Addiction, Young PeopleAbstract
Summary
Children and adolescents increasingly use the internet, raising concerns about problematic internet use (PIU), which is linked to addiction-like behaviours and dopamine stimulation similar to other addictions. PIU affects mental health, academic performance, and daily functioning, with boys more prone to gaming and girls to social networking. Factors include cognitive development, coping skills, and parental influence. Parental behavioural control can help, while psychological control may worsen PIU. Poor parent-adolescent communication and technoference increase risk. As the prevalence of PIU is high, understanding parenting styles, communication, and socio-cultural factors is crucial for developing targeted interventions to prevent PIU in young people.
Background
Children are using the internet and technology more and at earlier ages. Research suggests that younger adolescents are more likely to develop internet addiction as a result of non-essential internet use1 so internet addiction in adolescents is inversely proportional to age.2 It is generally well understood that the use of devices such as smartphones affects the production of dopamine, which is a chemical associated with addiction to smoking, alcohol, and gambling. Children who use these devices often show a similar pattern of addiction.3 Children and adolescents use the internet as their primary means of communication and socialization.4 Boys show greater addiction to online games whereas girls tend to be addicted more to social networks.5 Estimates suggest that approximately 30% of high school children have difficulties with their internet use.6
References
1. Chemnad K, Aziz M, Al- Harahsheh S, Abdelmoneium A, Baghdady A, Alsayed Hassan D, Ali R Assessing the Relationship Between the Type of Internet Use and Internet Addiction in Early and Middle Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study From Qatar JMIR Hum Factors. 2025;12:e62955. doi:10.2196/62955
2. Lozano-Blasco R, Latorre-Martínez MP, Cortés-Pascual A. Screen addicts: A meta-analysis of internet addiction in adolescence. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022.135:106373. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106373
3. Liu M LJ. Relationship between peripheral blood dopamine level and internet addiction disorder in adolescents: a pilot study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;6:9943–8.
4. Novaković S, Milenković S, Srećković M, Backović D, Ignjatović V, Capo N, et al. Children’s Internet use and physical and psychosocial development. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1163458. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163458.
5. Strittmatter E, Kaess M, Parzer P, Fischer G, Carli V, Hoven CW, et al. Pathological Internet use among adolescents: Comparing gamers and non-gamers. Psychiatry Res. 2015;228(1):128–35. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.04.029.
6. Oh WO. Factors influencing internet addiction tendency among middle school students in Gyeong-buk area. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003;33(8):1135–44. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2003.33.8.1135.
7. Marin MG, Nuñez X, de Almeida RMM. Internet Addiction and Attention in Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(4):237–49. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0698.
8. Cerniglia L, Zoratto F, Cimino S, Laviola G, Ammaniti M, Adriani W. Internet Addiction in adolescence: Neurobiological, psychosocial and clinical issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;76:174–84. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.024.
9. Aiman El Asam, Muthanna Samara, Philip Terry, Problematic internet use and mental health among British children and adolescents. Addict Behav. 2019:90:428-436. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.007.
10. Côrte-Real B, Cordeiro C, Pestana PC, Silva IDE, Novais F. Addictive Potential of Social Media: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal. Acta Medica Portuguesa. 2023;36(3):162–6. doi: 10.20344/amp.18470.
11. Barber BK Stolz, HE, Olsen J. Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2005;70(4):1–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x.
12. Zhu X, Deng C, Bai W. Parental control and adolescent internet addiction: the moderating effect of parent-child relationships. Front Public Health. 2023:11:1190534. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190534.
13. Smetana JG, Rote WM. Guest (guest) IP: 62.6.35.35 On: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org. Guest (guest) IP: 62.6.35.35 On: Tue. 2025. doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318.
14. Zhang J, Zhang Q, Xiao B, Cao Y, Chen Y, Li Y. Parental Technoference and Child Problematic Media Use: Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e57636. doi:10.2196/57636
15. Milkovich LM, Randell KA, Sherman AK, Moreno MA. Associations among Problematic Internet Usage in Adolescents, Parental Internet Factors, and Parent-Adolescent Communication J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2025;46(1):e40-e44. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001328.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Annals of King Edward Medical University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments publications@kemu.edu.pk