Pesticide-Induced Genotoxicity in Farmers of Southern Punjab as Indicated by Frequency of Micronuclei

Pesticide-Induced Genotoxicity in Farmers of Southern Punjab as Indicated by Frequency of Micronuclei

Authors

  • Hafiz Muhammad Atif Ali Syed Department of Anatomy, Nishtar Medical University, Multan
  • Sarah Khan Department of Anatomy, King Edward Medical University, Lahore
  • Areiba Haider Department of Anatomy, Narowal Medical College, Narowal
  • Raafea Tafweez Department of Anatomy, FMH College of Medicine & Dentistry, Lahore
  • Shahid Akhtar Department of Anatomy, King Edward Medical University, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v32i1.5963

Keywords:

Buccal cells, Farmers, Micronuclei, Pesticides exposure, Smoking, DNA damage

Abstract

Background: Farmers have an increased risk of pesticide-induced DNA damage which can be detected by the presence of micronuclei (MN) in buccal cells. Smoking may further amplify this genotoxic effect, making MN a valuable biomarker for assessing both occupational and lifestyle related DNA damage.
Objective: To determine the frequency of micronuclei as a biomarker of DNA damage in buccal mucosal cells of pesticide exposed farmers, with and without smoking.
Methods: A comparative analytical cross sectional study was conducted from May to November 2021 on farmers in Moza Durana Nigana, Tehsil & District Multan. A total of 135 participants aged 21–60 years were divided into three groups of 45 each: Group I – nonsmokers and non-farmers (control); Group II –pesticide exposed farmers, who were nonsmokers or smoked fewer than five cigarettes per day; Group III – pesticide exposed farmers who smoked 15–20 cigarettes per day. Buccal smears were collected and stained using the Papanicolaou technique. Slide preparation and analysis were performed in the Departments of Anatomy and Pathology, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, to detect micronuclei (MN) as an indicator of DNA damage.
Results: Pesticide exposed farmers showed a significantly higher frequency of micronuclei (MN), averaging 30.79 ± 9.65 per 1000 cells as compared to the control group, which had a frequency of 1.15 ± 0.38 per 1000 cells (p < 0.05). Among the exposed groups, Group III exhibited the highest MN frequency, indicating a synergistic genotoxic effect of pesticide exposure and smoking.
Conclusion: Pesticide exposure in farmers demonstrated a significant increase in DNA damage which is further amplified in those who smoke. 

References

1. Saddique N, Jehanzaib M, Sarwar A, Ahmed E, Muzammil M, Khan MI, et al. A systematic review on farmers’ adaptation strategies in Pakistan toward climate change. Atmos. 2022;13(8):1280. doi:10.3390/atmos13081280.

2. Nadeem F, Jacobs B, Cordell D. Adapting to climate change in vulnerable areas: farmers’ perceptions in the Punjab, Pakistan. J Clim. 2024;12(5):58. doi.org/10.3390/cli12050058

3. Jallow MF, Awadh DG, Albaho MS, Devi VY, Thomas BM. Pesticide exposure and safety practices among farm workers in developing countries: a review. Toxics. 2017;5(2):16. doi:10.3390/toxics5020016.

4. Buhroo Z, Ahmad B, Ganai N. Genotoxic effects of endosulfan, an organochlorine pesticide, on the silkworm Bombyx mori L. Int J Appl Res. 2016;2(10):235–53

5. Ramos JSA, Pedroso TMA, Godoy FR, Batista RE, de Almeida FB, Francelin C, et al. Multi-biomarker responses to pesticides in an agricultural population from Central Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 2021;754:141893. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141893.

6. Nascimento FA, Silva DME, Pedroso TMA, Ramos JSA, Parise MR. Farmers exposed to pesticides have almost five times more DNA damage: a meta-analysis study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(1):805–16. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15573-z.

7. Shekhar C, Khosya R, Thakur K, Mahajan D, Kumar R, Kumar S, et al. A systematic review of pesticide exposure, associated risks, and long-term human health impacts. Toxicol Rep. 2024;13:101840. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101840.

8. Davoren MJ, Schiestl RH. Glyphosate-based herbicides and cancer risk: a post-IARC decision review of potential mechanisms, policy and avenues of research. Environ Health. 2020;19(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12940-020-00670-7.

9. Hopf NB, Bolognesi C, Danuser B, Wild P. Biological monitoring of workers exposed to carcinogens using the buccal micronucleus approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019;781:11–29. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.006.

10. Kiran K, Agarwal P, Kumar S, Jain K. Micronuclei as a predictor for oral carcinogenesis. J Cytol. 2018;35(4):233–6.

11. Mehmood Y, Arshad M, Sieber S. What drives the use of highly hazardous pesticides and farmers’ beliefs about crop contamination in Punjab, Pakistan? Implications for sustainable agriculture and public health. J Food Prot. 2025;88(12):100646. doi:10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100646.

12. Ayres LCG, Dos Santos MAL, da Mota Santana LA, Avanci LDS, Souza DV, Lima BNS, et al. Comparative evaluation of mutagenic effects of two cone-beam computed tomography in oral mucosa cells. Diagn Cytopathol. 2023;51(12):729–34. doi:10.1002/dc.25206.

13. Ye CJ, Sharpe Z, Alemara S, Mackenzie S, Liu G, Abdallah B, et al. Micronuclei and genome chaos: changing the system inheritance. Genes. 2019;10(5)366. doi: 10.3390/genes10050366.

14. Heng J, Heng HH. Genome chaos: creating new genomic information essential for cancer macroevolution. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;81:160–75. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.11.003.

15. Gupta N, Rakshit A, Srivastava S, Suryawanshi H, Kumar P, Naik R. Comparative evaluation of micronuclei in exfoliated oral epithelial cells in potentially malignant disorders and malignant lesions using special stains. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23(1):157.

16. Upadhyay M, Verma P, Sabharwal R, Subudhi SK, Jatol-Tekade S, Naphade V, et al. Micronuclei in exfoliated cells: a biomarker of genotoxicity in tobacco users. Niger J Surg. 2019;25(1):52–9. doi:10.4103/njs.NJS_10_18.

17. Panico A, Grassi T, Bagordo F, Idolo A, Serio F, Tumolo MR, et al. Micronucleus frequency in exfoliated buccal cells of children living in an industrialized area of Apulia (Italy). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1208.

18. Tolbert PE, Shy CM, Allen JW. Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res. 1992;271:69–77

19. Cepeda S, Forero-Castro M, Cárdenas-Nieto D, Martínez-Agüero M, Rondón-Lagos M. Chromosomal instability in farmers exposed to pesticides: High prevalence of clonal and non-clonal chromosomal alterations. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:97–110. doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S230953

20. Grover S, Mujib A, Jahagirdar A, Telagi N, Kulkarni P. A comparative study for selectivity of micronuclei in oral exfoliated epithelial cells. J Cytol. 2012;29(4):230–5. doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.103940

21. Nambiar S, Hegde V, Yadav N, Hallikeri K. Improvization of conventional cytology by centrifuged liquid-based cytology in oral exfoliative cytology specimen. J Cytol. 2016;33(3):115–9. doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.188045

22. Gupta N, Rakshit A, Srivastava S, Suryawanshi H, Kumar P, Naik R. Comparative evaluation of micronuclei in exfoliated oral epithelial cells in potentially malignant disorders and malignant lesions using special stains. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23(1):157. doi:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_164_17.

23. Metgud R, Bhardwaj TN. Effect of staining procedures on the results of micronucleus assay in the exfoliated buccal mucosal cells of smokers and nonsmokers: A pilot study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(2):372–376. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.157351.

24. Khan MI, Khare A, Khan SS, Arif K, Nasir A, Lari S. Evaluation of micronuclei in oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders via different staining techniques. Eur J Clin Exp Med. 2024;22(3):556–566. doi:10.15584/ejcem.2024.3.15.

25. Cobanoglu H, Coskun M, Coskun M, Çayir A. Results of buccal micronucleus cytome assay in pesticide exposed and non exposed groups. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(19):19676–19683. doi:10.1007/s11356 019 05249 0.

26. Alhamadany AYM, Khalaf SD, Alkateb YNM. Genotoxicity and genomic instability in oral epithelial cells of agricultural workers exposed to pesticides using micronucleus and comet assay in Nineveh, Iraq. J Appl Nat Sci. 2023;15(2):473–479. doi:10.31018/jans.v15i2.4329.

27. Bolognesi C. Genotoxicity of pesticides: a review of human biomonitoring studies. Mutat Res. 2003;543(3):251–72. doi:10.1016/s1383-5742(03)00015-2.

28. Pereira CP, Souza LM, Silva CR. Assessment of genetic damage levels in agricultural workers exposed to pesticides in Paraíba, Brazil: a biomonitoring study. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2025;252:114070. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114070.

29. Hassan S, Sifat A, Munib M, Saeed S, Nisa WU, Durrani SH, et al. Cytomorphological changes of oral mucosal cells among smokeless tobacco users in low- and middle-income country settings: new findings from Pakistan. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1541. doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05220-7

Published

03/31/2026

How to Cite

Ali Syed, H. M. A., Khan, S., Areiba Haider, Raafea Tafweez, & Shahid Akhtar. (2026). Pesticide-Induced Genotoxicity in Farmers of Southern Punjab as Indicated by Frequency of Micronuclei. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v32i1.5963

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...