Exploring the Preferred Learning Style for Gross Anatomy among Undergraduate Medical Students in Pakistan: An Analysis Using the Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v30i4.5566Keywords:
Regional anatomy, undergraduate medical course, preferred learning styles, learning outcomesAbstract
Background: Learning styles encompass a student's mindset, influences, and actions that aid their learning within a specific context. Students frequently employ a blend of learning styles, with no inherent correctness or incorrectness associated with any particular style
Objective: Exploring the preferred learning styles for gross anatomy among undergraduate medical students in Pakistan is essential for academic trainers to tailor educational approaches effectively, enhancing student learning and outcomes.
Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 522 undergraduate medical students enrolled in a gross anatomy course, utilizing The Index of Learning Styles questionnaire (ILS). Participants were chosen through non-probability consecutive sampling. The collected data was analyzed employing SPSS 21.0.
Results: The analysis revealed that the predominant learning styles among these students were active (54.9%), sensing (85.1%), visual (81.2%), and sequential (74.4%). While we attempted to identify preferred learning styles for specific anatomical regions, no particular domain emerged as dominant. However, the active/reflective dimension was favored by learners specifically during the study of the head and neck region.
Conclusion: To optimize learning outcomes in gross anatomy courses for undergraduate medical students in Pakistan, integrating knowledge of preferred learning styles with teaching methodologies like the flipped classroom method is crucial. By incorporating active, sensing, visual, and sequential learning elements into course activities, designers can create a more engaging and effective learning experience.
References
Antoniuk A. Learning styles: Moving forward from the myth. Canadian Journal for new scholars in education/revue Canadienne Des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs en Éducation. 2019;10(2):1-8.
Zhang W, Li H, Li Y, Liu H, Chen Y, Ding X. Application of deep learning algorithms in geotechnical engineering: a short critical review. Artif Intell Rev. 2021; 54(4):1-41.
Valtonen T, Leppänen U, Hyypiä M, Kokko A, Manninen J, Vartiainen H, et al. Learning environments preferred by university students: a shift toward informal and flexible learning environments. Learn Environ Res. 2021; 24:371-88.
Martínez RA, Villalba-Condori KO, Arias-Chávez D. Some more spread myths about ICT in education. How to avoid them. Mendive. J Edu, 2021;19(4):1359-75.
Wu S, Xu YA, Han J, Jiang ME. Detecting the factors affecting the learning performance of students with different learning styles in flipped learning. ICIC Express Lett. Part B Appl. 2021;12(12):1137-44.
Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Sinclair J. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Comput Hum Behav. 2020;102(1):67-86.
Houser JJ, Kondrashov P. Gross anatomy education today: the integration of traditional and innovative methodologies. Mo Med.2018;115(1):61.
McHanwell S, Davies DC, Morris J, Parkin I, Whiten S, Atkinson M, et al. A core syllabus in anatomy for medical students-Adding common sense to need to know. Eur J Anat. 2023;11(S1):3-18.
Pritchard A. Ways of learning: Learning theories for the classroom. 4th edition. London.Routledge; 2017. [Internet]. [ cited 2024 feb 11]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315460611
Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD. Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anat Sci Edu. 2019;12(1):6-19.
Lin HC, Hwang GJ. Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interac Learn Environ. 2019;27(8):1011-27.
Betts K, Miller M, Tokuhama-Espinosa T, Shewokis PA, Anderson A, Borja C, et al., International Report: Neuromyths and Evidence-Based Practices in Higher Education. Online Learning Consortium. 2019:2(1):1-7.
AlQahtani N, AlMoammar K, Taher S, AlBarakati S, AlKofide E. Learning preferences among dental students using the VARK questionnaire: A comparison between different academic levels and gender. JPMA. 2018;68(1):59-64.
Barbosa Granados SH, Amariles Jaramillo ML. Learning styles and the use of ICT in university students within a competency-based training model.NAER. 2019;8(1):1-6.
Gajic MM, Miljanovic TB, Babic-Kekez SS, Županec VD, Jovanovic TT. Correlations between Teaching Strategies in Biology, Learning Styles, and Student School Achievement: Implications for Inquiry Based Teaching.JBSE. 2021;20(2):184-203.
Emami MR, Bazzocchi MC, Hakima H. Engineering design pedagogy: A performance analysis. Int. J Technol Desi Educ. 2020;30(3):553-85.
Yurdal MO, Sahın EM, Kosan AM, Toraman Ç. Development of medical school students’attitudes towards online learning scale and its relationship with e-learning styles. Turk Online J Distance Educ. 2021;22(3):310-25.
Quinn MM, Smith T, Kalmar EL, Burgoon JM. What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire. Anat Sci Edu. 2018;11(4):358-65.
Dalila AA, Rahmah S, Liliawati W, Kaniawati I. The effect of differentiated learning in problem based learning on cognitive learning outcomes of high school students. JPPIPA. 2022;8(4):1820-6.
Longobardi C, Settanni M, Lin S, Fabris MA. Student–teacher relationship quality and prosocial behaviour: The mediating role of academic achievement and a positive attitude towards school. Br J Edu Psychol. 2021;91(2):547-62.
Kaplan Sayı A, Yurtseven N. How do gifted students learn? Their learning styles and dispositions towards learning. Education. 3-13. 2022;50(8):1031-45.
Felder RM, Spurlin J. Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. IJEE. 2005 1;21(1):103-12.
Kirschner PA. Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education. 2017;106(1):166-71.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Annals of King Edward Medical University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments publications@kemu.edu.pk