This is an outdated version published on 01/28/2022. Read the most recent version.
A Comparative Analysis of Moral Principles: Veracity versus Confidentiality versus Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v27i4.4899Keywords:
Health care provider, Confidentiality, Veracity, Dilemma, Ethics, unethical, Decision making.Abstract
A number of frameworks can be used to analyze ethical and moral issues objectively whether the act of an individual is ethically good and bad. Health care providers are ethically concerned with clients' confidentiality and veracity in their clinical practice. The current article reveals the ethical dilemma of an infertile couple. Ethical issues affect the human being physical, mentally, and socially. If the Health care provider sustains the confidentiality, contrarily it will be against the principles of veracity therefore, the truthfulness will be the topmost importance.Downloads
Published
01/28/2022
Versions
- 02/02/2022 (2)
- 01/28/2022 (1)
How to Cite
A Comparative Analysis of Moral Principles: Veracity versus Confidentiality versus Justice. (2022). Annals of King Edward Medical University, 27(4), 605–607. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v27i4.4899
Issue
Section
Short Communications
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments publications@kemu.edu.pk